During Frozen, Kristoff is seen wearing Sami clothes and practicing a typically Sami occupation - being a handyman with a trained reindeer (although in real life, you can’t ride reindeer like a horse).
In line with this depiction, this is what Kristoff should look like adhering to what Sami looked like during the 1800s. Tan, with an Asian eyefold and black hair - because surprise! The Sami weren’t originally white! The only reason you end up with a bunch of white people when you google them is because they went through years of racial assimilation!
So there. This is what Kristoff could have been - Disney’s first male POC love interest to end up with a non-POC woman (the other way around has been done a lot, but not this.. for some reason..)
Because people are required to adhere to the practices, and traditions of ONLY their own ancestors.
Maybe Kristoff was Sami, or even part Sami, it’s never stated or even alluded to within the film. What someone is does not determine WHO they are, and it does not mark the creators of a fictional character badly. Frozen isn’t racist, it’s pretty damn accurate for the location.
If you want to bash on a movie for being racist, how about you look away from Disney, and towards Dreamworks for a little bit? Or one of Sony’s animation studios?