Bevendre

silver-tongues-blog:
quartz-poker:
dustyhooves:
wiselwisel:
I believe they are looking for “MMXV”
Really if you’re using Roman Numerals it should be MMDCCLXVIII AUC.
I mean if you’re going Roman, you should go full Roman and measure it ab urbe condita.
Actually it would be MMXV
No, Quartz Poker is right. It would be MMXV if you are going by Anno Domini, but the MMDCCLXVIII would be roughly accurate to Ab Urde Conditae, or the founding of the city and empire of Rome.
(via silver-tongues-blog)
1. amy97213 liked this
2. imperiumwifestrikesagain reblogged this from imperiumwifestrikesagain
3. oomfaloomfa reblogged this from miniaturehideoutbeliever
4. tumblurcoffeetablebook reblogged this from antigonestragedy
5. the-earnest-system liked this
6. coldcreature liked this
7. awritingarrow said: you ever see someone fail at roman numerals worse
8. awritingarrow liked this
9. moonlightink7 reblogged this from whiteassenby
10. moonlightink7 liked this
11. fellow-human9923 liked this
12. moonfableflor reblogged this from thatsthat24
13. moonfableflor liked this
14. justremainingmyself liked this
15. the-onering liked this
16. itsthedemonking reblogged this from i-really-should-change-my-url
17. tenaciousnightmarellama liked this
18. justdyingontheinside reblogged this from i-really-should-change-my-url
19. justdyingontheinside liked this
20. theandrogynousdragon liked this
21. i-really-should-change-my-url reblogged this from pippablue
22. smalfut liked this
23. squeackygee reblogged this from kingofkarrada
24. squeackygee liked this
25. justelliina liked this
26. hate-moss liked this
27. brdto liked this
28. billbear59 liked this
29. i-dont-need-opinions reblogged this from pragueskies
30. welele posted this
31. Show more notesLoading...