I never said Delphox was terrible. I said aspects about it were terrible.
I called its movepool terrible because it is. The movepool provides very little coverage, and does very little to work with Delphox’s stats or typing.
I called its hidden ability horrible because it’s an ability that lets it take the item from a pokemon that attacks it with a physical move, which Delphox likely won’t survive.
You made a comparison saying that “Greninja is cool, but Delphox is 100x better” and Twizz supported that from her experience.
I responded with my opinion, and if it came across as aggressive then it came across as aggressive, but it was written and thought out calmly.
Twizz responded calmly and further stated her opinion and experience, saying that she thought Greninja was cool, but didn’t want to use it because her boyfriend was and she preferred the Fennekin line. That’s fine, I have no problem with that. I’ve gone through the game with Fennekin, and with Froakie and though the Fennekin line is great in its own right, I and many others found Froakie’s to be better.
What I said was that aspects of Delphox make it worse than Greninja. Never did I insult the Pokemon itself, and I was more than happy to leave things be, but you came after me.
It was your opinion on your blog, an opinion that in posting publicly you allowed to be shared by the public, and it was. Twizz reblogged it to her blog with her opinion. I reblogged it to my blog with my opinion. That’s how this stuff works.
tllst
asked:
What I'm trying to say here is that you could have 1. Ignored the post 2. Simply stated you thought Greninja was better and provided some evidence as to why. What you actually did was reblog the post with a destructively critical, opinion statement about Delphox, using words like "horrible" and "terrible," and then claiming that that wasn't aggressive. I really don't understand how that could have been interpreted as calm when you were literally doing nothing but bashing Delphox for no reason.